4/5/2024 0 Comments Bias amp 2 vs amplitube 4I like how it keeps a single device in focus and you can easily see the device chain below. I find the gear way more attractive and realistic in appearance if that is a draw to you and has an inviting aesthetic. More isn’t always better but sometimes more is simply more. For me there is more available gear (at a cost of course). For what I have wanted to achieve I’ve got more mileage out of Amplitube 5. I am not a guitarist however and that may have a huge impact on decision making on which is best suited. I have both A5 and G6 and I run a few virtual guitar VST through them. That has the added advantage of making your board look more impressive. You can even use two gates in a setup: an early one to suppress the pickup/cable noise and a later one to control the noise from, say, fuzz or distortion. Start with it near the end of the chain but before the reverb or delay but it depends hugely on your chain and on your style of music. These days it's straight into software land and processed there.īut to answer your question, the pedal goes wherever you find it does the job that you need. When I did it was always a Boss pedal that had a send/return pair so you fed the guitar directly into it (or from a tuner) and then had the other pedals in the FX loop. Straight after the guitar, straight in front of the amp, in the amp fx loop or use the built in loop just around the noisy pedals. Do you use a hardware noise gate at all? Trying to work out the best place to put it in my effects chain. I just bought a Stone Deaf Noise Reaper noise gate. Its not a biggie but it seems like an odd design decision. It means you typically have to manually add one to any factory preset you try or use an outboard one. One slightly annoying feature of AT5 is that they got rid of the gate that was always at the head of the chain in AT4 and AT3. It could be the RAM, or it could be a difference between Studio One and Reason, or it could be the open-ended nature of the plugin - maybe you have lots more stuff in the signal path than I do. When mixing I sometimes increase the buffer, especially if I'm using much iZotope stuff but apart from that the 128 buffer is fine. I'm running Amplitube in Studio One rather than Reason and the CPU meter is barely troubled by it. It's a 2 year old PC with a fairly modest i5 CPU and 32 GB of RAM. What processor and how much RAM are you running if you don’t mind me asking? ![]() We really are spoiled for choice these days. It's been a long time since I miked up a real amp.too much faff. I know how to drive it and I've used it for years (top tip: turn off the cab sims). I mostly record rock, metal and blues with it but occasionally some outrageous Prodigy-esqe stuff too.Įven though Amplitube would also be fine for Pop stuff I tend to revert to an ancient hardware Behringer V-Amp for that, which I realise is not everyone's thing but it gives me the stuff I want. Works fine with a 128 buffer here, which is easily fast enough. I've tried 'em all and Amplitube gives me more than I need and I like the interface.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |